Spend stays inside your caps
Hard limits sit outside the agent, so no decision can go past them.
AI bid & budget management
Agents watch spend and pacing across Amazon, Meta and Google, work out why performance moved, and adjust bids and budgets through the official APIs. They start in recommend-only mode, and every action is logged.
What you get
Hard limits sit outside the agent, so no decision can go past them.
Stockouts, creative fatigue and holiday ramps get a response at machine speed, not at the next check-in.
Working from one warehouse, an agent can weigh Amazon against Meta and Google. Platform automation only sees its own data.
Every decision is traceable, so account managers can show a client what changed and why.
The problem
Classic automation is a thermostat: if ACOS > X, lower bid by Y. It works until the situation isn't in the rulebook: a competitor stockout, a creative fatigue curve, a holiday ramp. Human PPC managers handle those by reasoning across context. Agents bring that reasoning to machine speed and machine scale, without the burnout.
Before and after
What campaign agents do
How we work
Agents sit on top of a trusted data pipeline; we build or verify that layer first
Start in recommend-only mode so the team can grade the agent before it acts
Expand autonomy gradually, guardrail by guardrail, with hard spend limits always enforced
Instrument everything: every action traceable, every decision explainable to a client
Typical stack
Results

We rebuilt the ETL, warehouse and automation layer across Amazon, Walmart, TikTok, Instacart and Criteo.
Read the case study
We built the SP-API and Ads API pipelines, live dashboards and automation behind SellerFuse.
Read the case study
We built ETL pipelines into one data model and one dashboard for Amazon, Walmart and Instacart campaigns.
Read the case studyFAQ
Agents continuously monitor campaign data, diagnose why performance changed, and execute actions (bid adjustments, budget shifts, pausing keywords that waste spend, harvesting search terms) through official ad-platform APIs. Unlike static rules, agents reason about context (inventory, seasonality, competitors) and explain their decisions, functioning like a tireless junior PPC analyst with guardrails.
A rules engine executes exactly the logic you wrote; it can't handle situations outside it. An agent evaluates the situation against your goals and constraints and chooses an action, including 'escalate to a human.' In practice the best systems layer both: rules for the clear-cut high-frequency decisions, agents for the judgment calls between them.
Only with engineering discipline, which is the actual product: hard spend caps enforced outside the agent, allowed-action lists, approval gates for anything above thresholds, and full audit logs. We start every deployment in recommend-only mode and expand autonomy only as the agent's track record earns it.
Yes. That's where they beat platform-native automation, which only sees its own walled garden. An agent reading from a unified warehouse can notice Amazon ACOS rising while Meta prospecting gets cheaper and recommend a cross-platform budget shift no single platform's automation would ever suggest.
Tell us which decisions eat your team's hours. We'll scope an agent that handles them, in recommend-only mode first.