Feasibility per use case
What each one needs, what exists, and what closing the gap costs.
AI readiness appraisal
Before committing budget to AI, it is worth knowing whether your data can support it. This engagement assesses the use cases you have in mind against the data you actually hold, and ranks them by feasibility and value.
What you get
What each one needs, what exists, and what closing the gap costs.
Grounded in current process cost, not technical interest.
A clear recommendation per use case, with reasoning.
Sequenced from the use case most likely to prove value.
The problem
The failure mode is almost never the model. It is that the data the use case depends on is incomplete, inconsistently labeled, locked in a system with no API, or simply not collected. Teams discover this three months into a build, after the budget is committed and expectations are set. The second most common failure is choosing a use case that is technically achievable and commercially pointless, because it was picked from a vendor deck rather than from where the cost actually sits.
What the appraisal covers
How we work
Workshop candidate use cases with the people who own the affected processes
Profile the underlying data for completeness, consistency and accessibility
Score each use case on feasibility and value, and be explicit about what fails
Deliver the ranked plan with a recommended starting point and what to fix before the rest
What we use
Related work
FAQ
When that is the answer, yes, and it has happened. The most common version is not "never" but "not this use case yet": fix the data dependency first, or start with a narrower version that will actually work. An appraisal that approves everything is worthless as a decision input.
It depends entirely on the use case, which is the point of appraising rather than generalizing. A retrieval assistant over documentation tolerates messy data well. A forecasting model needs consistent history. An agent acting on budgets needs data that is correct and current, because a wrong action costs real money.
Yes, and quite often they win. For plenty of use cases a mature product is cheaper and better than anything custom. We flag those explicitly so you do not commission a build that a license would solve.
Typically two to three weeks: a workshop round, data profiling, then findings and a review session. Faster if the candidate use cases are already narrow and well defined.
Go deeper
Guide
AI agents in e-commerce go far beyond chatbots. Here's a practical look at where autonomous agents genuinely help and where human judgment still wins.
Read the guideGuide
RAG is the technique that stops AI assistants from making things up about your business data. Here's a clear, non-hype explanation of how it works.
Read the guideRelated
Agents grounded in your data, with scoped permissions, approval gates and audit logs.
Learn moreA written assessment of your data stack and a prioritized roadmap, in 2 to 3 weeks.
Learn moreA half-day, non-technical workshop for leadership teams and boards.
Learn moreTell us the use cases you are considering and we will assess whether your data can support them.